UNOWA SIX DEVELOPMENTAL DOMAINS PILOT STUDY: SENSORY FUNCTIONING AS A DISTINCT REGULATORY CONSTRUCT IN MULTIDIMENSIONAL DEVELOPMENTAL ASSESSMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69635/mssl.2026.2.3.51Keywords:
Sensory Functioning, Sensory Regulation, Developmental Assessment, Inclusive Education, Psychometrics, UNOWA, Humanai UNOWAAbstract
Sensory functioning is often included in developmental assessment as an auxiliary domain, although sensory regulation may directly shape attention, behavior, communication, participation, and adaptive functioning. This article examines sensory functioning as a distinct regulatory construct within a multidimensional developmental assessment model. The analysis is based on the UNOWA Six Developmental Domains pilot study, Version 2.0, conducted with 153 children aged 18–83 months. The instrument assessed five functional domains: cognitive, social, physical, sensory, and daily living skills. Each domain was scored using a Percentage Score from 0 to 100%, calculated from applicable age-based items. The sensory domain used an inverted scoring logic, where higher scores reflected greater sensory well-being.
The pilot data showed that sensory functioning behaved differently from the other developmental domains. Although the sensory domain showed a statistically significant but weak association with age, its correlation with age was substantially lower than that of the social, daily living, physical, and cognitive domains. In the interdomain correlation matrix, sensory functioning showed weak or near-zero associations with the other domains. Exploratory factor analysis further supported its distinct status: in the one-factor solution, the sensory domain had almost no loading on the general developmental factor, while in the two-factor solution it loaded strongly on a separate factor. Item analysis also indicated that the sensory domain requires refinement, with ceiling/floor effects and low item discrimination observed across the item pool.
These findings support the interpretation of sensory functioning not as a simple age-linear developmental scale, but as a regulatory profile that describes the conditions under which a child can remain organized, participate, learn, and adapt. The article argues for further differentiation of the sensory domain into subcomponents such as sensory hyperresponsivity, hyporesponsivity, sensory seeking, sensory avoidance, switching, activation, passivity, and self-regulation. The findings have implications for inclusive education, early intervention, individualized support planning, and future AI-assisted interpretation within the HumanAI UNOWA framework.
References
Alotaibi, H., Alduais, A., Qasem, F., & Alasmari, M. (2025). Sensory Processing Measure and sensory integration theory: A scientometric and narrative synthesis. Behavioral Sciences, 15(3), 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030395
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
Ayres, A. J. (1972). Sensory integration and learning disorders. Western Psychological Services.
Baranek, G., Little, L., Parham, L., Ausderau, K. K., & Sabatos-DeVito, M. (2014). Sensory features in autism spectrum disorders. In Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (4th ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118911389.hautc16
Baranek, G. T., David, F. J., Poe, M. D., Stone, W. L., & Watson, L. R. (2006). Sensory experiences questionnaire: Discriminating sensory features in young children with autism, developmental delays, and typical development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(6), 591–601.
Ben-Sasson, A., Hen, L., Fluss, R., Cermak, S. A., Engel-Yeger, B., & Gal, E. (2009). A meta-analysis of sensory modulation symptoms in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(1), 1–11.
Bliznashka, L., Hentschel, E., Ali, N. B., Hunt, X., Neville, S., Olney, D., Pitchik, H., Roy, A., Seiden, J., Solís-Cordero, K., Thapa, A., & Jeong, J. (2025). Psychometric properties of early childhood development assessment tools in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. BMJ Open, 15(3), e096365. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096365
Brandes-Aitken, A., Powers, R., Wren, J., Chu, R., Shapiro, K. A., Steele, M. C., Mukherjee, P., & Marco, E. J. (2024). Sensory processing subtypes relate to distinct emotional and behavioral phenotypes in a mixed neurodevelopmental cohort. Scientific Reports, 14, 78573. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-78573-2
Case-Smith, J., Weaver, L. L., & Fristad, M. (2015). A systematic review of sensory processing interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism, 19(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361313517762
Consoli, C., Turriziani, L., Antoci, M., Lo Monaco, M., Ceraolo, G., Spoto, G., Nicotera, A., & Di Rosa, G. (2025). Sensory phenotypes in autism spectrum disorder associated with distinct patterns of social communication, repetitive and restrictive behaviors or interests, and comorbidities: A state-of-the-art review. Brain Sciences, 16(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16010053
De Domenico, C., Di Cara, M., Piccolo, A., Settimo, C., Leonardi, S., Giuffrè, G., De Cola, M. D., Cucinotta, F., Tripodi, E., Impallomeni, C., Quartarone, A., & Cucinotta, F. (2024). Exploring the usefulness of a multi-sensory environment on sensory behaviors in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(14), 4162. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144162
DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.
Drobakha, A., Lahuta, L., Aponchuk, A., Kalitkin, M., & Nayda, R. (2026). Psychological testing as an instrument of differentiated support in education, healthcare settings, and crisis life transitions: Typological, trait-based, and psychodynamic approaches. Metaverse Science, Society and Law, 2(2), Article 38. https://doi.org/10.69635/mssl.2026.2.2.38
Dunn, W. (1997). The impact of sensory processing abilities on the daily lives of young children and their families: A conceptual model. Infants & Young Children, 9(4), 23–35.
Dunn, W. (2014). Sensory Profile 2: User’s manual. Pearson.
Galiana-Simal, A., Vela-Romero, M., Romero-Vela, V. M., Oliver-Tercero, N., García-Olmo, V., Benito-Castellanos, P. J., Muñoz-Martínez, V., & Beato-Fernandez, L. (2020). Sensory processing disorder: Key points of a frequent alteration in neurodevelopmental disorders. Cogent Medicine, 7(1), 1736829. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2020.1736829
Green, S., Hernandez, L., Lawrence, K. E., Liu, J., Tsang, T., Yeargin, J., Cummings, K., Laugeson, E., Dapretto, M., & Bookheimer, S. (2019). Distinct patterns of neural habituation and generalization in youth with autism, with and without sensory over-responsivity. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 176(12), 1010–1020. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.18121333
Gündoğmuş, E., Bumin, G., & Yalçın, S. (2024). Effect of early intervention on developmental domains and parent-child interaction among children with developmental delay: A randomized controlled study. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 78(6), 050706. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2024.050706
Kalitkin, M. (2026). UNOWA Six Developmental Domains pilot study: Sensory functioning as a distinct regulatory construct in multidimensional developmental assessment [Unpublished manuscript]. UNOWA.EU.
Kirby, A., Bilder, D., Wiggins, L., Hughes, M. M., Davis, J., Hall-Lande, J., Lee, L., McMahon, W., & Bakian, A. (2022). Sensory features in autism: Findings from a large population-based surveillance system. Autism Research, 15(4), 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2670
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Komanchuk, J., Cameron, J. L., Kurbatfinksi, S., Duffett-Leger, L., & Letourneau, N. (2023). A realist review of digitally delivered child development assessment and screening tools: Psychometrics and considerations for future use. Early Human Development, 183, 105818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2023.105818
Kostenko, O., & Zhuravlov, D. (2025). Reconceptualizing jurisdiction and legal identity in the metaverse: Elements of a digital code architecture. Metaverse Science, Society and Law, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.69635/mssl.2025.1.1.13
McCray, G., McCoy, D., Kariger, P., Janus, M., Black, M., Chang, S. M., Tofail, F., Eekhout, I., Waldman, M., Van Buuren, S., Khanam, R., Sazawal, S., Nizar, A., Schönbeck, Y., Zongo, A., Brentani, A., Zhang, Y., Dua, T., Cavallera, V., . . . Gladstone, M. (2023). The creation of the Global Scales for Early Development (GSED) for children aged 0–3 years: Combining subject matter expert judgements with big data. BMJ Global Health, 8(11), e009827. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009827
Miller, L. J., Anzalone, M. E., Lane, S. J., Cermak, S. A., & Osten, E. T. (2007). Concept evolution in sensory integration: A proposed nosology for diagnosis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(2), 135–140.
Parham, L. D., Ecker, C., Kuhaneck, H. M., Henry, D. A., & Glennon, T. J. (2011). Sensory Processing Measure: Manual. Western Psychological Services.
Piller, A., Conlin, J. M., Glennon, T. J., Andelin, L., Auld-Wright, K., Teng, K., & Tarver, T. (2025). Systematic review of sensory-based interventions for children and youth (2015–2024). Frontiers in Pediatrics, 13, 1720179. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1720179
Purpura, G., Cerroni, F., Carotenuto, M., Nacinovich, R., & Tagliabue, L. (2022). Behavioural differences in sensorimotor profiles: A comparison of preschool-aged children with sensory processing disorder and autism spectrum disorders. Children, 9(3), 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9030408
Schaaf, R. C., & Mailloux, Z. (2015). Clinician’s guide for implementing Ayres Sensory Integration. AOTA Press.
Schaaf, R. C., Benevides, T., Mailloux, Z., Faller, P., Hunt, J., van Hooydonk, E., Freeman, R., Leiby, B., Sendecki, J., & Kelly, D. (2014). An intervention for sensory difficulties in children with autism: A randomized trial. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 1493–1506.
Scheerer, N., Curcin, K., Stojanoski, B., Anagnostou, E., Nicolson, R., Kelley, E., Georgiades, S., Liu, X., & Stevenson, R. (2021). Exploring sensory phenotypes in autism spectrum disorder. Molecular Autism, 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-021-00471-5
Schoen, S., Lane, S., Mailloux, Z., May-Benson, T., Parham, L., Roley, S. S., & Schaaf, R. (2018). A systematic review of Ayres Sensory Integration intervention for children with autism. Autism Research, 12(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2046
UNOWA. (2026). Pilot study and psychometric evaluation of the “Six Developmental Domains” diagnostic instrument (five domains): N = 153 children aged 18–83 months, Version 2.0 [Unpublished pilot report].
Waldman, M., McCoy, D., Seiden, J., Cuartas, J., & Fink, G. (2021). Validation of motor, cognitive, language, and socio-emotional subscales using the Caregiver Reported Early Development Instruments: An application of multidimensional item factor analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 45(4), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254211005560
Williams, K. L., Kirby, A., Watson, L., Sideris, J., Bulluck, J. C., & Baranek, G. (2018). Sensory features as predictors of adaptive behaviors: A comparative longitudinal study of children with autism spectrum disorder and other developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 81, 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.07.002
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mykhailo Kalitkin (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published as open access and are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means that authors retain the copyright to the content of their articles. Under the CC BY 4.0 license, the content can be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, republished, or otherwise reused for any purpose, including commercial use, provided that proper attribution is given to the original authors.
