THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FORENSIC SCIENCE: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69635/mssl.2026.2.4.68

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Forensic Science, Digital Evidence, Forensic Examination, Admissibility of Evidence, Algorithmic Bias, Reliability

Abstract

This article examines the opportunities and challenges associated with the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in forensic science at the stages of collecting, examining, and evaluating evidentiary information. It considers the use of machine-learning algorithms, computer vision, and language models to process digital datasets, analyse photographs and video recordings, conduct biometric comparisons, examine documents, and detect synthetically generated content. AI can accelerate information retrieval and help identify relationships between data; however, technological efficiency does not guarantee the reliability of the result. The article analyses the risks of algorithmic bias, limited explainability, errors in training data, loss of digital context, breaches in the chain of custody, and excessive reliance on automated conclusions. In light of Ukrainian legislation and European approaches, it proposes a multi-level model for verifying neural-network outputs. The model includes documenting the tool, preserving original data, independent validation, describing methodological limitations, and ensuring that the parties to proceedings have a genuine opportunity to challenge the result. The article argues that AI should remain an auxiliary tool, while final forensic conclusions and procedural decisions must be made by competent human professionals in accordance with the law.

References

Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, Law No. 4651-VI (April 13, 2012, as amended July 21, 2026). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text

Durán, J. M., van der Vloed, D., Ruifrok, A., & Ypma, R. J. F. (2024). From understanding to justifying: Computational reliabilism for AI-based forensic evidence evaluation. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 9, Article 100554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100554

Nikolaichuk, T., & Solomakha, Y. (2024). On the use of artificial intelligence capabilities in forensic examination. Criminalistics and Forensic Examination, 69, 356–364. https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2024.69.34

Guan, H., Horan, J., & Zhang, A. (2025, January 27). Guardians of forensic evidence: Evaluating analytic systems against AI-generated deepfakes [Conference paper]. Forensics@NIST 2024. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://www.nist.gov/publications/guardians-forensic-evidence-evaluating-analytic-systems-against-ai-generated-deepfakes

On Forensic Examination, Law of Ukraine No. 4038-XII (February 25, 1994, as amended January 1, 2026). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4038-12#Text

On Personal Data Protection, Law of Ukraine No. 2297-VI (June 1, 2010, as amended June 14, 2025). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2297-17#Text

European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union, L 2024/1689. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng

Council of Europe. (2024). Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (CETS No. 225). https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/the-framework-convention-on-artificial-intelligence

Morán-Torres, R., Feld, K., Hesser, J., Taalab, Y. M., & Yen, K. (2025). Artificial intelligence and computer vision in forensic sciences: Applications in traumatic injury analysis. Rechtsmedizin, 35, 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-025-00775-3

Stoykova, R. (2024). A new right to procedural accuracy: A governance model for digital evidence in criminal proceedings. Computer Law & Security Review, 55, Article 106040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106040

Stacey, J., Fleming, R., Sheppard, D., Sheppard, J., Dobbie, G., & Karunakaran, D. (2025). A responsible artificial intelligence framework for forensic science. Forensic Science International, 375, Article 112548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112548

Kostenko, O., Zhuravlov, D., Dniprov, O., & Korotiuk, O. (2023). Metaverse: Model criminal code. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 9(4), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2023-9-4-134-147

Downloads

Views: 61

  |  

Downloads: 18

Published

2026-10-16

Issue

Section

Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Agents

How to Cite

Lazebnyi, A., & Krymchanin, B. (2026). THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FORENSIC SCIENCE: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS. Metaverse Science, Society and Law, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.69635/mssl.2026.2.4.68

Similar Articles

21-30 of 39

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.