ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND CYBERSECURITY IN THE ACTIVITIES OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69635/mssl.2026.2.1.35Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity, Law Enforcement Agencies, Cybercrime, Digital Technologies, Cyber Incidents, Information Security, Algorithmic Systems, Personal Data, Digital InvestigationsAbstract
The scientific study examines and substantiates, in accordance with the Law of Ukraine “On the Basic Principles of Ensuring Cybersecurity of Ukraine” of 2017, No. 45, which defines the terms indicators of cyber threats, information on a cybersecurity incident, cybersecurity incident, cyberattack, cybersecurity, cyber threat, cyber defense, and others, while the terms “national security,” “national interests,” and “threats to national security” are used in this Law in the meaning defined by the Law of Ukraine “On the Fundamentals of National Security of Ukraine.” The term “critical infrastructure object” is used in this Law in the meaning defined by the Law of Ukraine “On Critical Infrastructure.” The rapid digitalization of social relations, the growing number of cyber threats, the spread of cybercrime, and the increasing complexity of digital attacks require law enforcement agencies to implement new technological solutions capable of ensuring the prompt detection, analysis, and neutralization of threats in cyberspace.
It has been established that artificial intelligence in law enforcement activity may be used for monitoring cyber incidents, detecting anomalous activity in information systems, analyzing large data sets, automating responses to certain events, classifying malicious software, countering phishing, and supporting digital investigations. This constitutes a generalization and logical development of the officially defined tasks of the cyber police, which include combating cybercrime, systematizing cyber incidents, informing the public, and interacting with foreign partners.
It has been proved that the combination of artificial intelligence and cybersecurity tools opens significant opportunities for carrying out reform processes in the field of law enforcement activity in Ukraine and for regulating the status of law enforcement agencies in the Constitution of Ukraine, while at the same time generating new regulatory and ethical risks associated with the protection of personal data, algorithmic bias, the opacity of automated decisions, liability for system errors, and the need for constant human oversight. It has been clarified that Ukraine still lacks a special comprehensive act that would separately regulate the application of artificial intelligence specifically for ensuring cybersecurity in the activities of law enforcement agencies; therefore, the relevant legal relations are currently governed by the provisions of the Law of Ukraine “On State Protection of Court Employees and Law Enforcement Officers” and the Law of Ukraine “On the Basic Principles of Ensuring Cybersecurity of Ukraine.”
References
Constitution of Ukraine, No. 254k/96-VR. (1996, June 28). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр#Text
On information, No. 2657-XII. (1992, October 2). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2657-12#Text
On the National Police, No. 580-VIII. (2015, July 2). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/580-19#Text
On personal data protection, No. 2297-VI. (2010, June 1). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2297-17#Text
On the basic principles of ensuring cybersecurity of Ukraine, No. 2163-VIII. (2017, October 5). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2163-19#Text
Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, No. 4651-VI. (2012, April 13). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text
Council of Europe. (2001, November 23). Convention on cybercrime. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_575#Text
European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2024, June 13). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng
Council of Europe. (n.d.). The Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law. https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/the-framework-convention-on-artificial-intelligence
UNESCO. (n.d.). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics
Cyberpolice Department of the National Police of Ukraine. (n.d.). Cyberpolice: Official website of the Cyberpolice Department of the National Police of Ukraine. https://cyberpolice.gov.ua/
Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine. (2025, June 26). The Ministry of Digital Transformation is shaping an AI strategy—Join the survey and influence the future of AI in Ukraine. https://thedigital.gov.ua/news/technologies/mintsifra-formue-strategiyu-z-shi-doluchaytesya-do-opituvannya-i-vplivayte-na-maybutne-shi-v-ukraini
European Commission. (n.d.). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
Kostenko, O. V. (2022). Analysis of national strategies for the development of artificial intelligence. Information and Law, 2(41), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.37750/2616-6798.2022.2(41).270365
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Oleksandr Nikitenko, Olena Kryzhanovska, Illia Zhuravel, Volodymyr Zhuravel, Bogdan Krymchanin (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published as open access and are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means that authors retain the copyright to the content of their articles. Under the CC BY 4.0 license, the content can be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, republished, or otherwise reused for any purpose, including commercial use, provided that proper attribution is given to the original authors.
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6572-4072
